Door Kickers 2 Review (Papichu)
The game is halfway decent but the moderator is definitely biased and will ban you if you speak against his wishes. Don't try to ask for help, axios2006 the moderator will be condescending, Examples are below.
Asking for devs to be more transparent is definitely considered constructive and I wholeheartedly agree. I'm not going to dive in to see if devs have broken their promises, but if they have I would certainly agree that this would be considered Constructive as well.
You wrote: "Does players notice and read the pinned thread called "June 2024 NEWS and Doctrine Tree / Achievements Spoilers"?"
You telling your fan base over and over again to read the very first thread, myself and others agree that this isn't very effective since 1: It doesn't answer the question (which is why you keep getting the same question that you complain about answering over and over), and 2: it's now outdated information
Instead of answering your community questions you don't even answer it and say "Hi, last official announcement was published 5 days ago. Just read it. Thanks"
When asked by a majority of your fan base is asking for an updated ETA your reply is "Understanding that reading the news is too difficult...as written in the linked news."
And just now you're chastising your community because they don't have game dev experience?
You say "I'm tired to say everyday to check the updated news..." You have the opportunity to copy and paste from a FAQ and you chose to show unprofessionalism saying you're tired of doing your JOB..
Now add removing comments/ banning people for not agreeing with you.
This was in 5 minutes of research only on this thread. Try to avoid alienating your community and keep the sarcasm/ condescending tone to a minimum, Thanks.